Ultimate guide to 3rd party calls from your Aggregate
… and check why 5600+ Rails engineers read also this
Ultimate guide to 3rd party calls from your Aggregate
If you ever wondered how to make 3rd party API call from Aggregate and not clutter it with dependencies, you may find this post interesting.
Some time ago I faced that problem while implementing Payment
aggregate. Everything looked quite simple until the time a real request to payment gateway had to be performed.
I started wondering what is the right spot for that operation? Initially, I tried to do it in command handler. Let’s take a look at the snippet below.
class Payment
include AggregateRoot
CreditCardAlreadyCharged = Class.new(Error)
def initialize(id)
@id = id
end
def charge_credit_card(amount)
raise CreditCardAlreadyCharged if charged?
apply(CreditCardCharged.new(data: { payment_id: @id, amount: amount })
end
on CreditCartCharged do |event|
@state = :charged
end
private
def charged?
@charged
end
end
class OnChargeCreditCard
def call(cmd)
ApplicationRecord.transaction do
gateway.purchase(Integer(cmd.amount * 100), cmd.credit_card, { payment_id: cmd.payment_id })
with_aggregate(Payment, cmd.payment_id) do |payment|
payment.charge_credit_card(cmd.total_amount)
end
rescue Payment::CreditCardAlreadyCharged => doh
handle_disaster(doh)
rescue PaymentGateway::Error => doh
handle_payment_error(doh)
end
end
end
Command handler gets command, makes API call to the gateway and then event is applied to the aggregate. But what if another command happens and customer will be charged twice? That’s why we used aggregate pattern here, to guard the invariants. But this won’t work as expected with current implementation, since gateway request happens before aggregate gets called. Let’s change the order then:
def call(cmd)
ApplicationRecord.transaction do
with_aggregate(Payment, cmd.payment_id) do |payment|
payment.charge_credit_card(cmd.total_amount)
end
gateway.purchase(Integer(cmd.amount * 100), cmd.credit_card, { payment_id: cmd.payment_id })
end
end
This looks good at first sight. But what if payment doesn’t get accepted because of invalid credit card data or random network error appear? We already applied an event, event handlers started processing it. In effect user has received e-mail about successful payment, he got link to download virtual products, etc. We could make compensating operation, of course. The question is if there’s a possibility to do so.
We could try to do it other way around. Let’s expose Payment
internal state via charged?
method to command handler and make the decision there. Even more, CreditCardCharged
event could be published from command handler too. Introduction of aggregate wouldn’t make any sense in such approach, it would be obsolete.
What about passing gateway as a dependency and calling it inside Payment
aggregate? Sounds tempting, let’s see:
class Payment
include AggregateRoot
CreditCardAlreadyCharged = Class.new(Error)
CreditCardChargeFailed = Class.new(Error)
def initialize(id, gateway)
@id = id
@gateway = gateway
end
def charge_credit_card(amount, credit_card)
raise CreditCardAlreadyCharged if charged?
@gateway.purchase(Integer(amount * 100), credit_card, { payment_id: @id })
apply(CreditCardCharged.new(data: { payment_id: @id, amount: amount })
rescue PaymentGateway::Error => doh
raise CreditCardChargeFailed.new(doh)
end
on CreditCartCharged do |event|
@state = :charged
end
private
def charged?
@charged
end
end
class OnChargeCreditCard
def call(cmd)
ApplicationRecord.transaction do
with_aggregate(Payment, cmd.payment_id, gateway) do |payment|
payment.charge_credit_card(cmd.total_amount, cmd.credit_card)
end
rescue Payment::CreditCardAlreadyCharged => doh
handle_disaster(doh)
rescue Payment::CreditCardChargeFailed => doh
handle_payment_failure(doh)
end
end
end
Payment
class got cluttered and its responsibilities expanded. I’m not convinced that such technical details are the part of aggregate interests and I disliked this approach as soon as I implemented it. I started thinking how to make decision about the payment inside the aggregate but keep all the payment technicals out of it.
class Payment
include AggregateRoot
CreditCardAlreadyCharged = Class.new(Error)
CreditCardChargeFailed = Class.new(Error)
def initialize(id)
@id = id
end
def charge_credit_card(amount, request)
raise CreditCardAlreadyCharged if charged?
response = request.()
if response.success?
apply(CreditCardCharged.new(data: { payment_id: @id, amount: amount })
else
raise CreditCardChargeFailed.new(response)
end
end
on CreditCartCharged do |event|
@state = :charged
end
private
def charged?
@charged
end
end
class OnChargeCreditCard
def call(cmd)
ApplicationRecord.transaction do
with_aggregate(Payment, cmd.payment_id) do |payment|
payment.charge_credit_card(cmd.total_amount, cmd.credit_card, request)
end
rescue Payment::CreditCardAlreadyCharged => doh
handle_disaster(doh)
rescue Payment::CreditCardChargeFailed => doh
handle_payment_failure(doh)
end
end
private
def request
-> { gateway.purchase(Integer(cmd.amount * 100), cmd.credit_card, { payment_id: cmd.payment_id }) }
end
end
Instead of passing gateway as a dependency, we pass a payment gateway call wrapped in lambda. The only thing we need to do is to check whether response is successful to decided whether apply CreditCardCharged
event or not. We assume that payment gateway call returns Response
object responding to success?
method, but it’s not a topic of this post and I believe that you know how wrap gateways response into Value Object.
Lambda gives us great possibility of currying arguments and getting some from inside of aggregate state. Let’s use two-step payment scenario like CC Authorization & Capture. Often you need to refer original transaction when capturing the real money. Just prepare request
as a lambda with argument:
def request
->(transaction_id) { gateway.capture(transaction_id, Integer(cmd.amount * 100), cmd.credit_card, { payment_id: cmd.payment_id }) }
end
As a bonus, you get nice and clean aggregate tests without messing with mocks, VCRs, massive fake gateway adapters. Aggregate can remain interested in single method of Response
object only.
class PaymentTest < ActiveSupport::TestCase
def test_credit_card_charge_succeeded
payment_id = SecureRandom.uuid
payment = Payment.new(payment_id)
payment.charge_credit_card(amount, credit_card, successful_request)
assert_changes(payment.unpublished_events, [
CreditCardPaymentCharged.new(
data: {
payment_id: payment_id,
amount: BigDecimal("123.45"),
transaction_id: '53433'
}
)
]
)
end
def test_credit_card_charge_failed
payment = Payment.new(SecureRandom.uuid)
assert_raises(Payment::AlreadyAuthorized) do
payment.charge_credit_card(amount, credit_card, failure_request)
end
end
private
def amount
BigDecimal("123.45")
end
def credit_card
{
name: 'Jane Doe',
number: '4111 1111 1111 1111',
month: 1,
year: 2028,
verification_value: 123,
brand: 'visa'
}
end
def transaction_id
'12345'
end
def successful_request
->(*) {Struct.new(:success?, :transaction_id).new(true, transaction_id)}
end
def failure_request
->(*) {Struct.new(:success?, :transaction_id).new(false, transaction_id)}
end
end